Let’s Review Direct Oral Anticoagulant (DOACs)

Tiffany Proffitt, DO
By Tiffany Proffitt, DO on

If you’ve ever worked an ED at 3 AM during a holiday weekend, you know what’s coming: a patient visiting from out of town presents with a radiology report that is positive for a DVT. With no hematology or cardiology consults available, no access to the patient’s records, and the clock ticking, you’re left to manage the situation.

Should you prescribe a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)? What if the patient has renal disease or obesity? Is a “half dose” an option for an uncomplicated, first-time DVT? These are the questions we face in real-time. Let’s break down the unique challenges and evidence behind initiating DOAC therapy.

Renal Disease

Concerns:

  • Increased risk of adverse events because of decreased renal clearance, leading to a higher risk of bleeding.
  • Potential to worsen renal function.
  • The expense of DOAC therapy 

The Evidence:

Findings:

      • No difference in the incidence of stroke/thromboembolism between Apixaban and Warfarin.
    • Apixaban was found to have a lower risk of major bleeding compared to Warfarin. 
    • Standard dose Apixaban (5mg BID)  
      - Has the most data.
      - Was found to have a lower risk of stroke/systemic embolism and death compared to reduced dose Apixaban (2.5mg BID) or Warfarin. 
        • Data show no difference—perhaps safer—compared to Warfarin.

Verdict: Renal disease—DOACs Are Ok!

Obesity

Concerns:

    • DOACs are not as effective in the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with severe obesity (BMI > 40 kg/m2 or weight >120 kg).

The Evidence:

Findings:

  • Available data suggest that rivaroxaban and apixaban can be adequate for the treatment of VTE in patients with obesity regardless of body weight and BMI.
  • Further studies are needed to investigate therapeutic ranges for individual DOACs.

Verdict: Obesity—Sort of Ok!

  • Use weight, NOT BMI
    - Atrial fibrillation
    - Ok if < 150kg
  • Venous Thrombosis
    - “Guidelines”: no limit 
    - Acute < 150 kg
    - Chronic < 200 kg

Bariatric Patients

Concerns:

  • Decreased bio-availability in the post-operative patient due to the physical decrease in absorptive surfaces and or decreased caloric intake.

The Evidence:

Findings:

  • DOACs may be appropriate to prescribe 6-12 months after bariatric surgery. 
  • Expected Impact of bariatric surgery procedures on absorption of DOACs:

- Apixaban: primarily absorbed in the upper GI tract
     - Gastric Banding - unlikely to affect absorption

     - Partial/Sleeve Gastrectomy - unlikely to affect absorption 

    - Roux-en-Y gastric Bypass - possibly reduced absorption
  • Dabigatran: absorbed in the lower stomach and proximal small intestine
     - Gastric Banding - possibly reduced absorption
     - Partial/Sleeve Gastrectomy - possibly reduced absorption
     - Roux-en-Y gastric Bypass - possibly reduced absorption
  • Edoxaban: absorbed in the proximal small intestine
     - Gastric Banding - possibly reduced absorption
     - Partial/Sleeve Gastrectomy - possibly reduced absorption
     - Roux-en-Y gastric Bypass - possibly reduced absorption
  • Rivaroxaban: primarily absorbed in the stomach
     - Gastric Banding - possibly reduced absorption
     - Partial/Sleeve Gastrectomy - possibly reduced absorption
     - Roux-en-Y gastric Bypass - possibly reduced absorption

Verdict:  Bariatric Patients—It Depends  

  • Early/Acute setting after bariatric surgery—consider other agents
  • The acute alterations in the GI tract may lead to malabsorption.
  • Consider parenteral anticoagulation (Low molecular weight heparin).
  • Can switch to DOAC in stable post-acute bariatric patients (6-12 months post-op).

Half Dosing

Concerns:

  • Underdosed for concern for increased bleeding risk.
  • Underdosed populations most commonly: older patients, women, and patients with multiple comorbidities. 

The Evidence:

Findings:

  • Most data is for apixaban 2.5 mg bid and rivaroxaban 10mg daily 6 months or more after DVT/PE.
  • Higher rate of bleeding with minimal difference in the effectiveness of standard versus reduced-dose DOAC treatment in a nationwide study of nursing home residents with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. 
  • 2023 article supported the use of reduced-dose DOACs for older adults with multiple comorbidities. 

Bottom Line:  Half-Dosing - Maybe

  • Inappropriate dose reduction of DOAC is associated with more strokes and no difference in bleeding.
  • Dose reduction for AFIB only if the patient meets the criteria.

This content includes material generated by ChatGPT to aid in the editing process. All material has been human-reviewed and approved by our content team.
hippo-logo-hex-rainbow

Practice-Changing Education

Experience education that goes beyond theory. Explore Hippo Education’s offerings below.

Primary Care Pediatrics PA Emergency Medicine Urgent Care More